What Zarathustra was silent about. Diary of cable dancer

Structurally "Diary" is almost completely identical to his" Ego " - F. Nietzsche’s book, so said Zarathustra": the same parts and chapters, the subjects, the internal dynamics of the plot, the system of images are preserved. However, the content, as well as the essence of the text, is completely different, reverse. "Zarathustra" as if turned here inside out. The Nietzschean idea of ​​the superman "returns to the" diary "to his original, to the idea of ​​a person - what does it mean to be a person and is it possible for them, in general, to become? The idea of ​​an "eternal return", on the contrary, making a circle in a "diary, approaches its logical end - the acquisition of another in itself completes the movement.
The text of the "Diary" seems to be a work created in the spirit of postmodern, but this is not a postmodern. On the other hand, it may seem structuralistic, since the structures are clearly visible both in the elements of the text and in the form of presentation itself. However, this is not structuralism, this is something else, still uncertain ... and therefore absolutely original