Sacred and mysterious in the philosophical discharge of man

The curriculum of the presented course is designed for students of the Faculty of Philosophy, as well as for students undergoing familiarization with the problems of philosophy in the framework of interfacial readings and electives. This course was repeatedly read by the author in 2016–2020. At the Philosophy Faculty of Moscow State University named after M.V. Lomonosov.
In the course of lectures Sacred is considered as a type of discourse, which has developed under the influence of scientific boom at the turn of the 19th - 20th centuries. And tightly entered the intellectual field of our time. In the process of analyzing the basic concepts of discourse (ambivalence of sacred, the opposition “sacred - profane”, victim, violence, etc) show hidden meanings, ontology and anthropology inherent in this discourse. Contrary to the ordinary perception of the term, the “sacred” is not what indicates the presence of God, but, on the contrary, what requires the lack of God, His “death”. Through the idea of ​​the death of God, the author shows the connection of the philosophy of sacred with the concept of human death and the idea of ​​a post -member. The concept of sacred allows you to identify a mental gap between Russian and European cultural traditions. Unlike the European philosophical tradition, which uses the concept of sacred to describe a person, the Russian tradition, on the contrary, builds the philosophy of man, based on the idea of ​​the presence of God. Thus, we can talk about two anthropological models - “immanent man” and “human man”, respectively. In the spirit of the Russian tradition, the project of philosophical anthropology entitled “Liturgical Man” is proposed