Reason"s transactions. Constitution of Kantian philosophy of law

In the monograph, the philosophy of the law of Immanuel Kant is studied in the context of the legal logic of Kantian thinking as such. The difference between the question of fact (Quid Facti) and the question of law (Quid Facti) Quid Juris is associated with the status of philosophical knowledge as transcendental. Since the categories of reason are not applicable to themselves, transcendental knowledge cannot be explained in cognitive terms, but should be considered legally. Therefore, the understanding of the Kantus critical project requires attentive immersion in how the law is reflected inside this philosophy. Through an excursion into the concepts of the fact of the fact (chapter I), postulate (II), freedom (III), the rights in general (IV) and, finally, private and public law (V) monograph deploys the self -incriminating logic of the Kantian legal mind. Finally, Chapter VI illuminates the existing points of view on the question of the foundations of the Kantian doctrine of law in order to focus the peculiarity of the author’s position. Law is neither a derivative of a categorical imperative, nor isolated from it, it is another, along with it, an expression of significance, which a creature gives a person who recognizes its rationality.
2nd edition