Can metaphysics answer "eternal questions"?

To judge the advantages and disadvantages of a particular book*. First of all, it is necessary to determine which reader it is designed for. And whether the content, presentation of the material, the style of presentation of the requests of the potential reader who the author of the book mean. In this case, the task is simplified: the book was published in the series "works of members of a philosophical society", which means that it is designed for philosophers and those who are interested in philosophy. But it is enough to look through the book of a member of the RFO Eduard Sormin, to look through its table of contents to make sure: the author gives the material not in strict academic form, this is rather a style of popular science literature. Therefore, the book is not calculated on professional philosophers? But are they not interested in the biological problems of the origin of life, the physical problems of the explanation of the phenomenon of consciousness, the cosmological problems of the emergence of the universe? And to read about this text, saturated with professional terms from the corresponding field of knowledge, is not easy for a non -specialist, and simply boring. And even more so the reader, who is interested in science, but having only school education behind him. That is why Eduard Sormin, setting the goal of writing a book about possible answers to "eternal" questions, chose, in my opinion, a successful form of presentation of a rather complicated one - both in the scientific and philosophical sense - material: in the style of popular science literature. That is why his book is designed, as they say, "for a wide reader."