The case of Hamlet. Dialogue of the deaf

Pierre Bayar in a new book asks his favorite question: who is the real killer? But now we are talking about the Shakespearean "Hamlet". His "business of Hamlet" offers a solution to secrecy, for four centuries that have not grown the worshipers of Shakespeare - was Claudius really the killer?

Anna Karenina or Pierre Bezukhov each reader has his own, and this is wonderful! .. But the question arises: what are they really? The French literary critic and philosopher Pierre Bayar, who undertook a new "consequence of the Shakespearean Hamlet, refuses to accept this" actually". He claims: how many readers are so many Hamlets. Is it so bad that the literary hero during reading is overgrown with personal impressions and choice of each reader, becoming his peculiar "alter of the ego"? And why is the "dialogue of the deaf" so bad, that is, a misunderstanding of one reader to another? With rare emotional enthusiasm for scientific and popular literature, Pierre Bayar is starting an intellectual game with the reader, attracting Freudism and modern philosophy and ending with his own, extremely unexpected hypothesis about the Elsinor castle, a series of brutal murders.

Pierre Bayar - Knight of the Paradox. For him, everything in the world is a paradox, a double game, an occasion for humor and an impartial view of the researcher.
"Mond"